Fixed-scope written review

One decision question. One agreed record set. One controlled written position.

A Decision-Basis Review tests what the agreed record supports at a stated cut-off for one defined use. The output is a source-linked File-Position Note — or a formal limitation where the record cannot support one position.

Before any paid review

Start with the problem, not a ready-made question.

Tell us what is unclear in the written record. RGRA may propose multiple candidate documentary questions; the instructing client or partner approves the selected, bounded question(s), source set, cut-off, use and fee in writing. One accepted review unit never silently expands to cover every possible question.

FormatWritten-first
ScopeOne defined question
CommercialFixed scope / fixed fee
TargetIndicative only*

*Timing and price are confirmed only in an accepted written scope, after material and information-route checks. No general delivery commitment is made here.

The review unit

The question and the file are bounded before analysis begins.

Decision / reliance point

The exact question the work is commissioned to clarify.

Cut-off

The date or controlled period against which the sources are read.

Record set

The agreed core sources; no silent expansion into an unlimited repository.

Intended use

The audience and downstream use the written position is prepared to support.

Process

Fit → Written Scope → Scope & Material Acceptance → Review & QA → Controlled Release

  1. Fit

    Check whether the requested written position is distinct, bounded and not already adequately produced by an accountable function.

  2. Written Scope

    Fix the question, cut-off, audience, intended use and proposed record boundary in writing.

  3. Scope & Material Acceptance

    Confirm the agreed source set, information route, commercial terms and the review route required for the intended use.

  4. Review & QA

    Trace source identity, authority, status and version path; preserve qualifications and contrary material; locate the first unsupported step.

  5. Controlled Release

    Issue the File-Position Note for the agreed audience and use, with the exact limit of support stated.

Possible outcomes

A valid review does not have to end in a clean “yes”.

Supportable

The agreed record supports one bounded position for the stated use.

Qualified / partial

The position is supportable only with stated conditions, exclusions or scope limits attached.

Unresolved

Competing or incomplete positions remain and must be carried explicitly.

Non-determinable

The agreed set does not establish the proposed statement at the cut-off.

What the recipient can inspect

See the File-Position Note structure before sending documents.

A format-only illustration shows the reviewable fields, the source trail, qualifications and the exact unsupported step. It is not a real client outcome, an expert opinion or a sample of confidential records.

Forwardable brief

Corporate Decision-Basis Brief

A two-page explanation of the service, the review boundary, the deliverable and a public-record demonstration.

First page of the RGRA Corporate Decision-Basis Brief