Before systems diverge. Before narratives harden. Before accountability fragments.
I enter without touching systems or changing processes. I stabilise what is written, without assigning blame or exposure. I exit leaving a version of events that holds without me.
What remains after I leave
A written chain of events that can be replayed, audited, and defended — without interpretation.
Trigger
RGRA is engaged at the moment written reality must remain one — at the start (entry lock), midstream (fracture containment), or at closure (defensible reconstruction).
Always before interpretation replaces record.
The trigger is rarely a technical failure alone. It is the moment when:
RGRA is brought in to answer only that — in writing — before narrative replaces evidence.
Engagement typically begins with a single written decision or flow.
RGRA produces one coherent evidentiary chain, or explicitly records why such a chain cannot yet exist.
RGRA can be engaged before execution, during live delivery, or after a flow has already fragmented. The work may sit inside a finite project, within an ongoing operational flow, or across handover points where responsibility and narrative shift between roles. Engagement may involve a single artefact that closes one flow, a defined intervention during a programme phase, or a permanent written layer that governs how decisions are recorded and changed over time. The scope is always limited to written reality. If a flow cannot be stabilised through one authoritative written version, RGRA does not engage.
No dashboards.
No templates.
No system access.
This work operates exclusively on written records and defensible reconstruction.
What follows applies only once entry conditions exist.
If this page resonates immediately, pressure is already present.
It usually appears quietly — through parallel records, unresolved handovers, or incompatible explanations of the same event.
By the time it becomes visible, options are already constrained.
Illustrative format only. No assurance or opinion is provided.
Working Principle
Interface drift, mixed clocks, contradictory logs.
Verbal go-aheads and non-traceable execution.
Operational ambiguity reframed as certainty.
Records prepared for executive and evidentiary review.
Once the written record diverges, alignment does not self-correct.
This work is intentionally limited in scope and engagement count.